K. s. puttaswamy v. union of india
Web31 okt. 2024 · On 24 August, 2024, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India (hereafter SC or Court) unanimously affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under the Constitution (Justice K S Puttaswamy v Union of India 2012a).The bench recognised privacy as an inalienable right, grounded in values such as dignity which underlie all our … Web2 dagen geleden · Thrilled to share with you all that my article titled "Impact of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India on Aadhaar based services especially on electronic… 10 comments on LinkedIn
K. s. puttaswamy v. union of india
Did you know?
Web13 feb. 2024 · The six separate and concurring judgments in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Ret'd) and Anr v. Union of India and Ors are trailblazing for their commitment to privacy as a fundamental freedom and for the judges’ use of foreign law across ... 1 K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012 (Sup. Ct. India Aug ... WebOn 24th August 2024, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India passed a historic judgment affirming the constitutional right to privacy. …
WebJustice K. S. Puttaswamy (born 8 February 1926) is an Indian retired judge of the Karnataka High Court who was also the original petitioner, challenging the Government of India over making Aadhaar mandatory. [1] Web26 aug. 2024 · In regard to this, a retired High Court Judge K.S. Puttaswamy filed a petition in the year 2012 against the Union Of India before a nine – Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of the country, challenging the constitutionality of Adhaar because it is violating the ‘Right to Privacy’.
WebJustice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), a retired judge of the Madras High Court, challenged the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme. He argued that the scheme violated the … Web1 dag geleden · In India, the debate over data protection and privacy was framed in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India[1], in which the Supreme Court declared the right to privacy to be a basic ...
WebJustice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2024) By: Olivia Rosen, Cornell India Law Center . Summary . Aadhaar is the world’s largest biometric identification system under which Indian residents and passport holders are eligible to obtain a unique 12-digit identification code based on their demographic and biometric data.
Web10 apr. 2024 · A retired High Court Judge K.S. Puttaswamy filed a petition in 2012 against the Union of India before a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court challenging the … hawaii bottom fishing applicationWeb12 nov. 2024 · The case has been brought by retired High Court judge K S Puttaswamy against the Union of India. According to his claim, Aadhar scheme violates article 14 [6] … bosch wall oven 27 inchWeb24 dec. 2024 · The Aadhaar scheme has been challenged before the Supreme Court by Justice K.S. Puttaswamy, a retired judge of the Karnataka High Court. He claims that … hawaii bottom fishing setupWebOn 24th August 2024, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India passed a historic judgment affirming the constitutional right to privacy. It declared ... bosch wall oven 30 inchWebJustice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2024), also known as Right to Privacy verdict is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which … hawaii boulderingWebFormer Justice K.S. Puttaswamy challenged the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act, mainly on the basis that it creates a surveillance state and infringes upon the right to … hawaii bottom fish registrationWeb11 aug. 2015 · State of T.N 1994 6 SCC 632 (popularly known as Auto Shankar case) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India 1997 1 SCC 301. 5. All the judgments referred to above were rendered by smaller Benches of two or three Judges. 6. hawaii bowl 2022 prediction